Which is NOT a ground for a federal court to decline supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims?

Which is NOT a ground for a federal court to decline supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims?

• A. The claim raises a novel or complex issue of state law.
• B. The claim substantially predominates over the federal claims.
• C. The federal court has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction.
• D. The state claims are identical or substantially similar to the federal claims.

Answer: (D)